TehBamski@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoWhat's the best loophole you've ever found or learned about?message-squaremessage-square197fedilinkarrow-up1128arrow-down11
arrow-up1127arrow-down1message-squareWhat's the best loophole you've ever found or learned about?TehBamski@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square197fedilink
minus-squareLedivin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day agoYeah, you can miss me with the religious bullshit. This is a legal loophole in a legal system.
minus-squareFlax@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 day agoIf it was for religious reasons, I would have specified it as a “man and a woman”
minus-squareShepherdPie@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoThen what is your basis for it only being between two people? You’re defining it just like religion does because that’s where you got the idea even if you don’t realize it.
minus-squareFlax@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·17 hours agoBecause that’s what marriage is and always has been, anything else is contrary to human nature
Yeah, you can miss me with the religious bullshit. This is a legal loophole in a legal system.
If it was for religious reasons, I would have specified it as a “man and a woman”
Then what is your basis for it only being between two people? You’re defining it just like religion does because that’s where you got the idea even if you don’t realize it.
Because that’s what marriage is and always has been, anything else is contrary to human nature