whats your thought on open relationship? if both living in different states

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    I might consider either an open relationship or a long distance relationship, but the problem in both cases would be I’d worry more about it falling apart and being replaced, both of those at once seems like a lot.

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    It can never be as deep as a monogamous one (ceiling, not floor) and idk anyone IRL who would be okay with it in earnest (and not just saying they are not to lose the person thinking about opening it, or access to their resources), so idk. I would say I’m cautious about them, particularly how healthy they can be.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I don’t see being able to handle it. I find the sex hormones are kinda linked to the jelously hormones. I really can’t handle someone I am with being with someone else. Of course my hormones are assholes so it would likely be no problem with a bunch of people where exclusively with me. thats why the harem fantasy is so big.

  • dragonlover@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    So ive been in open poly relationships before and am very sex positive. The problem is several fold and it mostly comes down to education of everyone involved and comfort of all parties.

    1. There needs to be solid trust and communication between all members. If you dont have this it will fail. This is why going open will never fix a broken relationship.
    2. Some people arent able to let go of the jealous feeling of their partner being with someone else and thats ok it just means being poly / open isnt for them.
    3. Everyone has to be ok with the arrangement before it happens. None of this “I get to kiss/fuck whoever I want but you dont” stuff.
    4. The reason you want to be open matters. Do you just find it exciting? Does your partner? Are you long distance and so want to keep your options open? Does the partner know that? Are you into a kink your partner isnt into and they are ok with you experimenting? Are you in love with multiple people and want them all and they are also cool with that? Giant cuddle puddle sounds great? It all comes down to trust again. It can NEVER be because you’re trying to compensate for something your partner lacks without the consent of the partner

    If there are any hard feelings in the relationship they will be compounded. So make sure the relationship is solid first.

    Also being open doesnt automatically mean each person can do whatever they want. Talk yo your partner about partners you want to being in. Talk to the new people about your current partner. Make sure everyone is kosher about what’s happening (and also make sure everyone is regularly getting tested for STDs)

  • Gyrcas@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m polyamorous myself, I think it’s just important to clearly establish rules about it with the people you are dating. Personally, my only rule is that anyone already in the relationship needs to agree when adding a new person. If someone says no, then it’s no

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    if both living in different states

    Key context right there.

    Either you stay deliberately ignorant about what happens when you’re apart, or you’re going to feel the same as you would about it normally.

  • zout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Open relationships may work, if you’re both comfortable knowing the other sleeps with other people. But living in different states? That sounds more like fuck buddies than a relationship to me.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    My thought is “Why?”.

    I fell like you need to people who are radically honest with others and I don’t understand why the long distance relationship is being maintained.

  • thethrilloftime69@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I think why you are choosing to do it matters. I think open relationships can be successful, but like are you doing it to keep a relationship on the rocks going? Or are you both legitimately capable of polyamory and able to be available to each other and your other partners in a way that doesn’t feel demeaning to anyone involved?

  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It seems like an exhaustingly complex set of boundaries to keep and tends to create winners and losers out of third parties if the boundaries are rigidly followed in most cases. I think being that secure is somewhat admirable, but it also seems like a devastating fall to make if things don’t work out. Different folks have different ways of doing things, I think it’s fine, just not for me personally and I definitely wouldn’t want to be the 3rd party to it either.

  • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I haven’t been able to subdue/erase/accept the emotion of jealousy, which sort of makes me unable to enjoy the wonders of it, but I wish I could. 😭

    With that said, I am a relationship anarchist. 😊 I don’t believe in distinctions and labels. There is only what you and I have, period. Regardless of whether it’s sexual, romantic, platonic or whatever.

  • HeroCool@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    i try not too much concern myself with other peoples relationships

      • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’m with you on this one, Chippy. But you kinda have to let people be useless, as long as they’re harmless at least. We just gotta tolerate it (even if the obvious "virtue signalling " is annoying) and move on without losing our temper. 🥲

        • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It’s a non answer that just serves to pat themselves on the back for being “good”. The question is also about the concept of open relationships. You can talk about that concept without viewing it through the lense of other people’s business. It’s a frustrating thing I see regularly in comments on posts like this. The idea you have to comment just to let everyone know you don’t have an opinion because you’re too moral.

          • [deleted]@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Did you just comment to whine about someone else’s comment to show off how much better you are by (incorrectly) saying their view wasn’t meaningful enough?

            • strakitar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              No, no OP has a point. That poster’s comment was inane, and you are only looking stupid by defending that as a good post

            • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Their view added nothing. It served only to show that they don’t have an opinion. So again, why comment if you’re not willing to have an opinion. Its just moral posturing, its annoying and cringy.

                • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 hours ago

                  I would place them in the same category as monogamous heterosexual relationships. I think creating a delineation between heterosexual relationships and homosexual ones like your doing is a strange way to make a point. I also lived with a lesbian couple for a few years when I was younger. In my personal anecdotal experience, I like hanging out with lesbian couples more than gay male couples, but about as much as heterosexual couples. Granted, that’s my personal lived experience. I wouldn’t assume I’d get along better with either on average though. Mostly just the people I knew. Weird to create that divide considering an open relationship is in no way equivalent to a gay one. In fact, some open relationships are gay.

  • AskewLord@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    waste of time.

    way too many people pursue the wrong people and do stuff like open relationships as a cope.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If by cope, you mean it has emotional utility, then, yeah. All relationships are a cope for loneliness and disconnection, no matter the arrangment.