Let’s have a lunch and learn!

  • TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    “We work hard and play hard” makes my skin crawl. Also, had a manager who would describe every situation with a war analogy. Sorry Bob, this is Finance, we’re not literally killing each other. Take it down a notch.

  • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    MVP - as in “minimum viable product”

    More commonly known as the slop of a product or solution that’s being slinged to all the markets early on without adequate documentation, support, usability, scalability, standards or security.

    “Corner the market” also deserves a disgusting mention.

    • feddup@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      Especially if the MVP ends up with a lot of scope creep for features that are not MVP

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    “You don’t have a sense of urgency to get things done”. I usually get this when I’m going crazy to get things done so my status reports and presentations suffer. I understand paperwork is necessary, but can’t you at least say that rather than claiming I’m not getting things done. Meanwhile they’re satisfied with my sends of urgency to get things done if I just ignore my work and pamper them with status reports and PowerPoints.

  • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I had one retail manager who constantly kept using “moving forward” for everything. It was so freaking grating!

    I hate that I’ve learned to censor myself around these soulless void-skulls by replacing “problem” with “challenge.” No, I don’t “solve problems”, because to acknowledge something as a problem is negativity we just don’t need here at Emperor Clothing Inc! I “tackle challenges”!

    It’s so freaking goofy and they just eat it up. Everything needs some sort of business-positive spin or they lose their minds and think you’re not being a “team player.”

  • feddup@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    48 minutes ago

    Leadership at the company I work for started saying “let’s double click that” to mean let’s go into more detail on that topic. Hate it.

    Also “let’s take this offline” which just means let’s have a different meeting about it, it’ll still be online because we’re all remote.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      41 seconds ago

      The first one is an Abomination unto Nuggan. I’m OK with the second one being used in a meeting to divert a topic that needs covered but is getting off tack.

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Oh snap I should have read more comments before posting about “double clicking”. I hate it.

      I’ve been hearing “velocity” a lot recently and that also makes me cringe.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Do you have a better way to phrase it? I usually see this to mean “focus on this topic rather than get distracted. We can discuss that later” … or I guess that’s a better way to phrase it

      • feddup@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        Let’s take that offline perhaps better as let’s discuss that separately/later.

        Double clicking should just be something like “to go into more detail” or something. I get why it happens, easy and quick to say, i just find it so irritating.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Collaboration. I have never worked at a single company that wanted people talking or collaborating on the work floor, or even when sharing a cubicle, let alone listen to any suggestion us peons had to offer. They keep using it as an excuse for RTO.

  • yool_ooloo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    ‘contextual knowledge’

    this gem was put forward in all seriousness when the data didn’t support the claims in the report: “it’s not in the numbers, but we have a pretty good sense that this is true”

  • Twig@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The term “let’s slow time this” was used for a while. I can only assume that was some corporate phrase.