Literally the headline. Not illegal at all is best of course.

I’d like to have a sort of reverse Warrant Canary of sorts, that will pop if security is breached

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    8·
    22 hours ago

    Erotic fiction involving minors. I believe it is protected under the 1st amendment but obviously no one wants to host it.

  • That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml
    92·
    1 day ago

    If this were Reddit, opposing the genocide in Gaza and speaking out against the Biden administration for supporting it would get you reported swiftly.

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    324·
    2 days ago

    On lemmy.world, expressing support for Luigi Mangione/murdering CEOs.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    131·
    2 days ago

    If you don’t count copyright infringement as illegal, then yeah, uploading a Disney clip or song, or Beatles music. That’s probably the fastest way (on something like YouTube).

    If you’re talking about anywhere/Lemmy, then just upload a post like “…?” to a popular AskLemmy community. It’ll probably get removed fairly quickly, and the ? Will help it bypass any filter that takes down anything not ending with a question mark.

    Of course, if auto removals are ok, then just upload something with a banned keyword or try posting “…” to an AskLemmy community to trigger a bot that may remove posts not ending in “?”.

  • Aeao@lemmy.world
    162·
    2 days ago

    "I encourage violence "

    Not illegal to say that at all.

    If you specify a person it’ll get flagged faster. If you mention certain people you might get a visit for the secret service. Still not illegal to say but it’s often treated like it is.

      • Aeao@lemmy.world
        11·
        2 days ago

        I disagree. I understand they are vague, I understand that is purposeful so they can prosecute how they chose.

        I still argue it’s freedom of speech and never illegal.

        Again let’s use the example of a hypothetical famous or political person. If they were to haphazardly suggest people should invade a federal building. I would say that was irresponsible, foolish, and it’s fine to judge someone for doing such a thing. I wouldn’t call it illegal to mention you like violence to happen.

        However if they were to add things to the statement like “on this day” or “you have to because the sky is green” I’d say there are legal implications for coordination or manipulation with false facts… Saying you want something to happen shouldn’t be illegal on its own.

        Jokes aside I do understand there is a line between freedom of speech and causing a crime.

        “Someone should hurt bob boberson” I feel is okay

        “On Tuesday we are going hurt bob boberson because if we don’t hell hurt you” thats not as okay. That’s a plan, that’s spreading lies

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      5·
      2 days ago

      I’m in a medieval reenactment society, and about a year ago some people were getting temp bans on Facebook for announcing fencing practice by saying “come stab your friends!”

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    81·
    2 days ago

    I don’t understand how something such as you’re asking would be a reverse warrant canary? Canaries get pulled as a way of broadcasting something without breaking a court order not to talk about it. How would you do a reverse of that by posting something that breaks the rules or violates norms?

    • Valmond@lemmy.worldOP
      3·
      21 hours ago

      Say I make a secure network that you all can use.

      A warranty canary would be the famous “FBI has not yet been here” on the page I’m sharing on this network right?

      But what if this is a decentralised network where there is no central node that can be compromised? How will I even know if the security of the network has somehow been breached?

      My idea is this reverse warranty canard; if one day I get a cease and desist letter, I know the network has been infiltrated in one way or another.

      Up til I get that, it’s not like I’m 100% safe (like when the “FBI hasn’t been here yet” is stil there), but if I do get one, I know I’m not.

      Maybe the reverse warranty canard exists and I’m using it all wrong, otherwise it made sense for me.

      Edit: as pointed out its warrant canard not warranty canard.

      • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        8·
        1 day ago

        Lmao entirely unrelated but I love the slow autocorrect degradation of “warrant canary” into “warranty canard” throughout your comment

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techEnglish
    121·
    2 days ago

    The GTA 4 mod was just given a takedown by rockstar. Not illegal, but they didn’t like it for sure. So just build a mod for rockstar, Nintendo, one of them

    • Valmond@lemmy.worldOP
      4·
      2 days ago

      Thanks! I do know how to do it (memotechnique is it’s like a C function) but I still mess it up from time to time 🤷🏼‍♀️

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      2·
      2 days ago

      First, it didn’t get taken down so I’m not sure why you shared this. Secondly, this definitely appears to be a troll post so yeah people usually don’t like being trolled. I’m not sure why you’re acting surprised.

      Edit: ignore me, I’m ignorant of the ways of twitter.

      • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeMEnglish
        1·
        2 days ago

        It was marked as invisible by those in charge (except for those who can go right to it) and was the sole reason images are not coded into the top right of pages anymore. But the original question about the most non-illegal ways to trigger the censors brought the incident to mind. It’s certainly not “illegal”, in fact it’s protected by the rights most nations have, yet it causes a lot of different reactions. Of note, even the series the character was inspired by could be said to have this going for it, albeit with a few differences. I drew her as a homage to people we had been talking/arguing about (there were a lot of people wishing death on each other at the time due to the current war being fresh), and I wasn’t actually anticipating it would be necessarily interpreted as actually drawing a certain historical figure.